Date Posted

The Supreme Court considered a case called Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, that threatens to undermine the freedom of working people to join together and negotiate for better wages and working conditions. Corporate CEOs and their allies know that working people have a much stronger voice when we speak together, so they are pulling out all the stops to silence our voices. 

But the reality about Janus is significantly different than the rhetoric of those behind it. Here are some key ways how:

Rhetoric: This is about stopping unions from funneling union members' money to politicians the members disagree with.

Reality: Plaintiff Mark Janus has always enjoyed the legal protection that he's seeking. Not one cent of his money can be used to support any candidate's political campaign over his objection. Period.

Learn more about Janus at Freedom to Join.